Bartman
Senior Member
Something that has bothered me about wine making since I started (which wasn't long ago in the relative scheme of things) is the number of chemicals that one is supposed to use when making wine. Some hundreds of years ago, I can't imagine that wine makers had Campden, metabisulphate, sorbate, acid testers, pH testers, hydrometers, acid blend, clarifying agents, let alone sanitizers! So how did they do it?
We're sure they were eating, drinking, and being merry and we're sure it included wine. So how could they make it with out "modern technology"?
Has anyone else contemplated this? What have you found? Why can't wine be made "simply"?
Yeah, I have to agree with early posters that said if we all just did things in the simplest effective manner, there would be little need or reason for a discussion forum. I avoid using most of the chemicals in kit wines and don't sweat the adequacy of my sanitizing efforts. It's telling that there is little/no comment from the forum folks I know enjoy the chemistry, testing and adjustment that goes into (typically) modern, mass-production wine practices/procedures. To each his own, ya know?
Two observations came to mind in reading this thread - 1) the alcohol in the wine has always been the primary preservative, and that was the 'magic' of fermenting fresh food for later consumption. What other edible liquid can be stored at room temperature for months or years without specialized canning or preservative equipment? Oil and water, but neither are both nutritious and drinkable. That alcohol (which could be called an 'added chemical' if you want to be technical) killed off the bad microbes early on and kept them at bay however the wine was stored. Oxidation, on the other hand, was probably the bugger threat, most of the time, depending on how the wine was stored.
2) Which reminded me of the Hemingway novel, "For Whom the Bell Tolls", about the Spanish Civil War a few years before WWII. In it, the fugitive guerrillas move through the countryside and one of the critical items the group would move from place to place was the 'wineskin'. Tha was often their only source of available potable fluid, but it was drunk fairly quickly soon so oxidation wasn't as much of an issue. Here's Wikipedia's description:
A bota bag or wineskin is a traditional Spanish liquid receptacle. Typically, it is made of leather (when made of goatskin it is known as a goatskin itself), and is used to carry wine, although any liquid will do.
Traditionally, bota bags were lined with goat bladders or in other cases tree sap or other resins were used to prevent liquids from seeping through. The nozzle, traditionally in horn, is fixed by a red collar. The zahato is carried across the shoulder with the red cord which surrounds it along the seam.
Modern bota bags have a plastic liner and nozzle.
I don't plan on using that 'traditional' method, but it is fascinating to see how people 'made do' in ages gone by.