<RANT>I am fed up with people like The Center for Science in the Public Interest, which is no such thing. It is made up of people with a radical agenda, much like PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). Give those two groups their way and the Earth, which now feeds, what?, 5 billion people, could support about 250 million.
It's all marketing. How you describe something. Neither of the above listed organisations is in any way representative of what their name suggests. PETA, for example, has tried to "free" dogs from "captivity" at dog shows. (I used to show Yorkies, and have 7 as pets now.) Is it good for the dog to release it into the "wild" in the middle of a city?
CSPI wants us to eat only that which is "natural" and "healthy." In other words, grow it yourself, and don't even think about poisoning that bug that's eating your tomato plant. Spend your day picking the bugs off with your fingers and stepping on them. (Acceptable to CSPI, not acceptable to PITA.)
If CSPI and PITA had their way that 12 oz. New York Strip (medium rare for me, please) on the menu at the local steak joint would be offered as a Slab of Muscle Tissue Hacked from the Side of an Immature Castrated Bull, Treated with Chemicals. (Salt and pepper are chemicals, aren't they?)</RANT?
Sorry, guys. This one hit one of my hot buttons. Masta, feel free to kill my post if you think you should.