 |
|
09-30-2011, 01:52 PM
|
#1
|
|
Junior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: , WV
Posts: 26
|
Stabilizing?
I understand why stabilizing is required and how to do it. BUT, what is the benefit of stabilizing shortly after primary when the SG is at the desired level of .0990-.0996? Why wouldn't you just let the wine bulk age sans stabilizing and if you plan to backsweeten stabilize at that point? Or, if its destined to be a dry, why stabilize at all?
thanks for any input.
(note -I leave my wines in bulk age for 1 year+)
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 02:25 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Central, MO
Posts: 2,217
Liked 57 Times on 49 Posts Likes Given: 18
|
I usually wait until the wine is reasonably clear before I add sorbate/backsweeten. I find I'm better able to judge how much I want to backsweeten when the wine has a bit of age.
The down side to waiting is that time is added to the overall timeline - backsweetening can result in another sediment throw-off. Backsweetening early seems to help wine clear faster, IME.
By waiting, I sometimes decide to leave a batch dry that I was originally planning to sweeten.
OTOH, if I'm repeating something I've done before, I sorbate/backsweeten pretty early b/c I know how it's going to turn out. This saves time.
There is no hard, fast rule. Use the approach that you prefer for your wine.
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 02:30 PM
|
#3
|
|
Junior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: , WV
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobF
There is no hard, fast rule. Use the approach that you prefer for your wine.
|
gotcha...that's what I was thinking. Everyone has their own methods. If I'm going to backsweeten I normally stabilize, wait a few weeks, sweeten and wait another week before bottling to ensure there is no haze.
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 03:28 PM
|
#4
|
|
Super Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 5,070
Liked 105 Times on 100 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lopez
I understand why stabilizing is required and how to do it. BUT, what is the benefit of stabilizing shortly after primary when the SG is at the desired level of .0990-.0996? Why wouldn't you just let the wine bulk age sans stabilizing and if you plan to backsweeten stabilize at that point? Or, if its destined to be a dry, why stabilize at all?
thanks for any input.
(note -I leave my wines in bulk age for 1 year+)
|
Stabilization is adding Kmeta and sometimes, depending on the instructions, need for backsweentening, and your preference, sorbate.
Your primary reason for adding Kmeta to your wine should be to protect it from bacteria/spoilage. So the idea is to get that protection as soon as possible and that is immediately after the wine becomes dry.
Delaying the addition of Kmeta can potentially be costly.
Sobate is another matter. It prevents the yeast from multiplying, so that adding a backsweetener will not restart active fermentation. Once sorbate is added, the yeast still alive, when the backsweetener is added, can still convert sugar to alcohol and CO2, but they won't be able to do it for long. As long as the wine is dry, you can delay the addition of sorbate. So, as long as sorbate is added before backsweetening, you will be fine, even if you delay backsweetening.
__________________
Robie
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 04:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
Junior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: , WV
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robie
Stabilization is adding Kmeta and sometimes, depending on the instructions, need for backsweentening, and your preference, sorbate.
Your primary reason for adding Kmeta to your wine should be to protect it from bacteria/spoilage. So the idea is to get that protection as soon as possible and that is immediately after the wine becomes dry.
Delaying the addition of Kmeta can potentially be costly.
Sobate is another matter. It prevents the yeast from multiplying, so that adding a backsweetener will not restart active fermentation. Once sorbate is added, the yeast still alive, when the backsweetener is added, can still convert sugar to alcohol and CO2, but they won't be able to do it for long. As long as the wine is dry, you can delay the addition of sorbate. So, as long as sorbate is added before backsweetening, you will be fine, even if you delay backsweetening.
|
That was partially my question. I always thought stabilizing was the addition of sorbate to prevent refermenting. I always add sulfite when bulk aging for protection from bacteria and oxygen. I thought that they were adding Sorbate right after the SG gets to dry.
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 06:16 PM
|
#6
|
|
Super Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 5,070
Liked 105 Times on 100 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lopez
That was partially my question. I always thought stabilizing was the addition of sorbate to prevent refermenting. I always add sulfite when bulk aging for protection from bacteria and oxygen. I thought that they were adding Sorbate right after the SG gets to dry.
|
It's a matter of terminology, I guess. Typically, the sorbate is added when you add the Kmeta, as a part of the stabilizing step. Since I never make a wine that requires just backsweetening, I don't add sorbat. However, as I mentioned, I do make summer wines, which include an F pack; they of course will require sorbate.
__________________
Robie
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 07:31 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beaver, PA
Posts: 2,636
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts Likes Given: 5
|
Isn't degassing considered part of the stabilizing step? Or is it just a step which is "normally" done while stablizing?
__________________
Mike
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 07:33 PM
|
#8
|
|
Super Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 5,070
Liked 105 Times on 100 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem
Isn't degassing considered part of the stabilizing step? Or is it just a step which is "normally" done while stablizing?
|
I guess you could look at it either way, but yes, I (IMO) agree with you, it's always something I do as a part of the stabilizing step. You are adding possibly two things and getting rid of another.
__________________
Robie
Last edited by robie; 09-30-2011 at 07:35 PM.
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 07:34 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Central, MO
Posts: 2,217
Liked 57 Times on 49 Posts Likes Given: 18
|
I am always degassing the wine when I rack b/c I use vacuum. After racking when dry, I also continue to degas using vacuum as degassing aids the clearing process.
|
|
|
09-30-2011, 07:38 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Central, MO
Posts: 2,217
Liked 57 Times on 49 Posts Likes Given: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robie
Stabilization is adding Kmeta and sometimes, depending on the instructions, need for backsweentening, and your preference, sorbate.
|
I agree, robie. There are different types of stabalizing; microbial/spoilage and refermentation in the presence of sugar.
I read the OP's question to be referring to stabalizing against referment.
I don't think of k-meta as a singular stabalizing step as it should be added as many times as is needed along the way.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Wine Making Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
need for stabilizing
|
Chami |
General Wine Making Forum |
11 |
02-12-2010 03:16 PM |
|
Stabilizing
|
Benjo's Mom |
Beginners Wine Making Forum |
5 |
08-06-2008 01:28 AM |
|
WineXpert Stabilizing ?
|
Slingshot |
Kit Winemaking |
6 |
03-04-2007 10:47 PM |
|
Stabilizing
|
Kief |
Country Fruit Winemaking |
6 |
09-25-2006 06:47 PM |
|
Stabilizing
|
klamb |
General Wine Making Forum |
7 |
09-08-2006 12:28 AM |
|
|
|