Wine Making & Grape Growing Forum > Wine Making > Beginners Wine Making Forum > Random observation from the fringe...




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2011, 05:36 PM   #1
Old Philosopher
Amateur
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Old Philosopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 693
Default Random observation from the fringe...

Hi, all! Been awhile since my last visit. Lost but not forgotten.

After several batches of strawberry, raspberry and peach, my records show a trend. I'm wondering if there are other tangible variables, or if I'm on to something?

Up until the last three batches, I crushed and strained the fruit, and then added yeast to the juice. My usual yeast is Pasteur Red. The last three batches I decided to do the primary fermentation with the fruit in the strainer bag in the primary.

All things apparently equal, I noticed that the juice alone completed fermentation (primary and secondary) in 25 to 36 days, and took longer to get down (SG-wise) where they were ready for the secondary. The batches with the fruit in the bag have gone to completion in 8-18 days!

Am I imagining things, or is there a real reason for this?

Thanks for any replies.



__________________
"The more I understand, the less I know. Pretty soon I'll understand everything, and know nothing!"

Last edited by Old Philosopher; 07-24-2011 at 10:34 PM.
Old Philosopher is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-25-2011, 04:47 PM   #2
robie
Super Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 5,173
Liked 121 Times on 116 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Interesting. I can't imagine why it takes less time in the bag. Seems if anything it would take maybe a slight bit longer.

Is the room temperature about the same as before?
Are you punching down the bag? Maybe what's in the bag never gets fully fermented... just a guess, though.


__________________
Robie

Last edited by robie; 07-25-2011 at 04:49 PM.
robie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-25-2011, 05:14 PM   #3
Old Philosopher
Amateur
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Old Philosopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 693
Default

I was just wondering if maybe there were more nutrients in the must that allowed the yeast to feed better, whereas the plain juice was lacking that.
To clarify, with two batches sitting side by side, one with the fruit pulp, and the other with plain juice, and using the same yeast, the plain juice seems to ferment at a slower rate.
__________________
"The more I understand, the less I know. Pretty soon I'll understand everything, and know nothing!"
Old Philosopher is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-25-2011, 06:01 PM   #4
robie
Super Moderator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 5,173
Liked 121 Times on 116 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Philosopher View Post
I was just wondering if maybe there were more nutrients in the must that allowed the yeast to feed better, whereas the plain juice was lacking that.
To clarify, with two batches sitting side by side, one with the fruit pulp, and the other with plain juice, and using the same yeast, the plain juice seems to ferment at a slower rate.
Got it!
Your explanation concerning nutrients just might be it.
__________________
Robie
robie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-25-2011, 07:53 PM   #5
BobF
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BobF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Central, MO
Posts: 2,229
Liked 61 Times on 51 Posts
Likes Given: 19

Default

I would say nutrients is for sure the correct answer!
BobF is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-25-2011, 08:07 PM   #6
Old Philosopher
Amateur
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Old Philosopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 693
Default

Well, going back over my detailed records of each batch, has helped me learn. I've heard of it being done both ways, but it's obvious now why the experts, (Wade, Tom, et al) leave the fruit in the bag in the primary.
__________________
"The more I understand, the less I know. Pretty soon I'll understand everything, and know nothing!"
Old Philosopher is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-26-2011, 01:23 AM   #7
Daisy317
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Daisy317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western PA
Posts: 417
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Putting fruit in the bags helps the primary from getting a bunch of gunk in it. It also keeps fruit from plugging the siphon hose either when you transfer. I'm not interested in getting wine done quickly because I'm pretty patient... The convenience is reason enough for me


__________________
Primary:
Raspberry
Secondary:
Garlic & Onion
Strawberry Watermelon
Cherry Skeeter :pee
Bulk Aging:
Apple
WE German Muller-Thurgau
:b
Daisy317 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Wine Making Forum Replies Last Post
Random New Labels.... closetwine Bottles, Labels & Corks 16 06-18-2011 04:13 AM
An observation and opinion... djrockinsteve General Chit-Chat 13 06-23-2010 01:27 PM
Casual observation Old Philosopher General Chit-Chat 42 11-10-2009 09:19 PM
Interesting Observation yankeewinemaker General Wine Making Forum 2 11-11-2008 09:30 AM
Interesting observation Trubador General Wine Making Forum 7 06-18-2007 11:23 PM



FOLLOW US ON



SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0